MCRP 12-10B.1, page 32
Military Operations on Urbanized Terrain (MOUT)
Marine Corps Reference Publication: Military Operations on Urbanized Terrain (MOUT)
Public distribution statement A; S2 KOCOA cited as MCRP 12-10 b.1
Searchable page text (OCR / PDF)
Chapter 2
Offensive Operations
Urban combat isolates and separates units. Operations are reduced to a series of
small-unit actions, placing a premium on small-unit leadership, initiative, and skill.
2001. Introduction. The Marine Corps' manuever warfare philosophy guides the conduct of
offensive operations in MOUT. This warfighting philosophy serves to guide commanders through
the development, planning, and execution of missions. A detailed discussion of maneuver warfare
can be found in MCDP 1, Warfighting, MCDP 1-3, Tactics, MCWP 3-1, Ground Combat
Operations (under development), and other Marine Corps doctrinal publications.
This chapter focuses only on offensive operations in an urban environment where collateral
damage is of minimal concern. It describes tactics, techniques and procedures to be employed for
seizing and clearing buildings and other urbanized areas. Chapter 6 addresses some considerations
associated with fighting under constraints and restraints on urbanized terrain.
Section I
Planning
2101. Considerations. Identification of the adversary’s centers of gravity and critical
vulnerabilities will allow the commander to focus his/her efforts on those portions of the built-up
area essential for mission accomplishment.
a. Reasons for Attacking a Built-Up Area. A commander considers the following before
deciding to attack a built-up area:
(1) Tactical Advantage. Cities control key routes of commerce and provide a tactical
advantage to the commander who controls them. Control of features such as bridges,
railways, and road networks can have a significant impact on future operations. Urbanized
areas may be used by the enemy as a base of operations from which they launch their own
offensive operations. It may be advantageous to attack those bases and separate the enemy
from their support infrastructure.
(2) Political Advantage. The political importance of a built-up area may justify the use of
time and resources to liberate it. Capturing a city could destroy the seat of local and
national government. At the very least, it could deal the enemy a decisive psychological
blow.
(3) Economical Advantage. The destruction or capture of key industrial and commercial
cities with the resulting denial of production and distribution of equipment and supplies
strikes at the enemy’s future ability to wage war. The requirement for a logistics base,
2-1