MCRP 12-10B.1, page 34
Military Operations on Urbanized Terrain (MOUT)
Marine Corps Reference Publication: Military Operations on Urbanized Terrain (MOUT)
Public distribution statement A; S2 KOCOA cited as MCRP 12-10 b.1
Searchable page text (OCR / PDF)
2102. Commander's Estimate. Once assigned the mission to attack a built-up area, a thorough
mission analysis is conducted. Marines follow the same planning process in MOUT as for other
operational environments by evaluating the mission, enemy, terrain and weather, troops and
support available, and time available (METT-T). Based on METT-T and application of maneuver
warfare concepts, the commander can decide on a plan that defeats the enemy by exploiting
identified critical vulnerabilities. The commander may not have sufficient forces to fight
everywhere and so must focus on the enemy and concentrate resources to decisive ends. This may
involve making conscious decisions to accept risk at some place or time and to seize opportunities
at others. The challenges of an urbanized environment dictate an even greater need to fully
understand maneuver warfare.
This section addresses METT-T considerations as they pertain to the offense in urban warfare.
METT-T is covered in detail in MCRP 3-11.5A, Marine Troop Leader’s Guide.
a. Mission. Mission analysis is the first step of the estimate process. One of the important
mission analysis considerations in urban conflict is the scope of clearance required to accomplish
the mission. Commanders and planners should ask themselves the following questions:
Do I need to clear every building?
Should I clear only certain blocks?
Should I only control certain areas?
What level of protection is required for my lines of communication?
b. Enemy. Maneuver warfare focuses on the enemy. The intelligence preparation of the
battlefield (IPB) process should be used to analyze the enemy and terrain in detail. (See Field
Manual (FM) 34-130, Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield.) The commander decides
whether threat forces are conventional or unconventional.
(1) Conventional Forces. Most potential adversaries have adopted techniques of urban
combat from either the United States or the former Soviet Union. Therefore, potential
adversaries will build their urban defense to counter the attack of a combined arms force.
Potential enemy forces will normally organize their defense in depth. Prepared strong
points will usually form the perimeter of a larger defense while reserves locate in a
separate position within the perimeter. You can expect ambushes to fill gaps in the
perimeter while dummy strongpoints are established to deceive the attacker. Positions for
securing the entrances to and exits from underground structures and routes are normally
established. Security positions will normally be located forward of first-echelon defensive
positions.
(2) Unconventional Forces. Urban areas have become a haven for unconventional forces.
The large noncombatant population provides cover and concealment for unconventional
Military Operations on Urbanized Terrain
2-3