s2underground_search · Manuals
Military manual ATP 2-33.4 Page 61 of 146 text: pdf

ATP 2-33.4, page 61

Intelligence Analysis

Army Techniques Publication: Intelligence Analysis

2014 public edition (Archive.org)

Page 61 of ATP 2-33.4
Searchable page text (OCR / PDF)
Core Army Analytic Techniques 18 August 2014 ATP 2-33.4 5-7 Mathematical Analysis Enemy Situation: There is an insurgent cell of approximately 11 seasoned fighters operating in and around the town of Tuc. The cell leader is known among the local populace, local police, and the Afghan Army in the area. He grew up in the area and is familiar with the local terrain. The cell has conducted several successful attacks against Afghan military forces in the last 12 months. Their most common method of attack is using an “L” shaped ambush in complex terrain. Intelligence analysis indicates this type of cell is generally equipped as follows: • 11 x AK-47s. • 2 x 9-mm pistols. • 1 x RPD light machinegun. • 3 x RPG-7V. • 8 x fragmentation grenades. • 4 x ICOM radios. • 11 x personal cell phones. • 6 x command-detonated improvised explosive devices. Friendly Situation: The mission is to conduct a foot reconnaissance of route to village used for commerce. The patrol leader has been to the village on three occasions (once by helicopter and twice as a patrol member). This is his first time as the patrol leader. Prior to departure, patrol was briefed that the area had no indicators of enemy presence or activities. The patrol consists of 16 x personnel: • 12 x U.S. Soldiers (including a public affairs office team of 2). • 2 x Interpreters and translators (also called I/Ts). • 2 x Afghan soldiers (both speak Basic English). The patrol is equipped with— • 10 x M4s (2 with grenade launchers). • 2 x surface acoustic waves. • 5 x AK-47s. • 4 x 9-mm pistols. • 2 x antitank weapons. • 40 x fragmentation grenades. • 2 x manpacked satellite communications radios. • 15 x personal cell phones. A quick mathematical analysis reveals the following: When considering total numbers, force ratio favors friendly forces by a factor of 1.4 to 1. However, when considering just combat troops, the ratio is about 1:1. Additionally, there are intangibles that must be factored in: • Combat experience and leadership favor the enemy. • Area knowledge favors the enemy. When evaluating firepower, the results are as follows: • Crew-served weapons: force ratio favors friendly forces at 2:1. • Assault rifles: force ratio favors friendly forces at 5:4. • Pistols: force ratio favors friendly forces at 2:1. • Grenade launchers: force ratio favors friendly forces at 1:5. • Antitank weapons: force ratio favors enemy forces at 2:0. • Grenades: force ratio favors friendly forces at 5:1. • Demolitions: force ratio favors enemy forces at 6:0. Intangibles: • Type and amount of ammunition are even. • Fields of fire and cover and concealment favor the enemy. Conclusion: Based on aggregate force ratios, U.S. force would most likely be defeated by an undetected enemy ambush. Recommend additional reconnaissance to mitigate enemy advantages and ensure the security of the patrol.