JP 3-0, page 75

Joint Functions III-23 objective. For more guidance on assessment, refer to paragraph 6, “Assessment,” of Chapter II, “The Art of Joint Command.” b. Key Considerations. The following are key considerations associated with the above tasks. (1) Targeting supports the process of linking the desired effects of fires to actions and tasks at the component level. Commanders and their staffs must consider strategic and operational objectives, the potential for fratricide and other undesired fires effects, and legal limitations (e.g., constraints and restraints) when making targeting decisions. Successful integration of IO considerations into the targeting process is important to mission accomplishment in many operations. (a) Oversight. JFCs may task their staff to accomplish broad targeting oversight functions or may delegate the responsibility to a subordinate commander. Typically, JFCs organize joint targeting coordination boards (JTCBs). If the JFC so designates, a JTCB may be either an integrating center for this effort or a JFC-level review mechanism. In either case, it should be composed of representatives from the staff, all components and, if required, their subordinate units. The primary focus of the JTCB is to ensure target priorities, guidance, and the associated desired results link to the JFC’s objectives. Briefings conducted at the JTCB should focus on ensuring that all components and applicable staff elements coordinate and synchronize targeting efforts with intelligence and operations. (b) Delegation of Joint Targeting Process Authority. The JFC is responsible for all aspects of the targeting process, and may conduct joint targeting at the joint force HQ level or authorize a component commander to do so. The JFC normally appoints the deputy JFC or a component commander to chair the JTCB. When the JFC does not delegate targeting authority and does not establish a JTCB, the JFC performs this task at the joint force HQ with the assistance of the J-3. In this instance, the JFC may approve the formation within the J-3 of a joint fires element to provide recommendations to the J-3. The JFC ensures that this process is a joint effort involving applicable subordinate commands. Whoever the JFC authorizes to plan, coordinate, and deconflict joint targeting must possess or have access to a sufficient C2 infrastructure, adequate facilities, joint planning expertise, and appropriate intelligence. For additional targeting guidance, refer to JP 3-60, Joint Targeting. (c) Air Apportionment. In the context of joint fires, air apportionment is part of the targeting process. Air apportionment is how the JFACC ensures the weight of joint force air effort is consistent with the JFC’s intent and objectives. After consulting with other component commanders, the JFACC recommends air apportionment to the JFC, who makes the air apportionment decision. The JFACC’s rationale for the recommendation may include priority or percentage of effort based on the JFC’s CONOPS, specific tasks for which air assets are essential, and other factors such as the component commanders’ joint fires requirements. Following the JFC’s air apportionment decision, the JFACC allocates and tasks the capabilities/forces made available.