JP 3-0, page 78
Joint Operations
Joint Publication: Joint Operations
11 August 2011 public edition
Searchable page text (OCR / PDF)
Chapter III
III-26
JP 3-0
or dismantle these illicit financial networks. Monitoring, assessing, analyzing, and
exploiting financial information are key support functions for CTF activities.
For more guidance on joint interdiction operations, refer to JP 3-03, Joint Interdiction.
(5) Strategic Attack. A strategic attack is a JFC-directed offensive action against
a target—whether military, diplomatic, economic, or other—that is specifically selected to
achieve national or military strategic objectives. The JFC should consider conducting
strategic attacks, when feasible. These attacks seek to weaken the adversary’s ability or will
to engage in conflict or continue an action and as such, could be part of a campaign, major
operation, or conducted independently as directed by the President or SecDef. Additionally,
these attacks may achieve strategic objectives without necessarily having to achieve
operational objectives as a precondition. Suitable targets may include but are not limited to
enemy strategic COGs. All components of a joint force may have capabilities to conduct
strategic attacks.
(6) IO Capabilities in Support of Fires
(a) CNA disrupts, denies, degrades, or destroys information resident in
computers and computer networks (relying on the data stream to execute the attack), or the
computers and networks themselves.
(b) EA involves the use of electromagnetic (EM) energy, directed energy, or
antiradiation weapons to attack personnel, facilities, or equipment with the intent of
degrading, neutralizing, or destroying adversary combat capability. The effects of EA can be
lethal or nonlethal. EA can be used against a computer when the attack occurs through the
electromagnetic spectrum (EMS), while CNA attacks using the data stream through the
AIR INTERDICTION DURING OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM
During Operation IRAQI FREEDOM, most of the effort against Iraqi ground
troops was focused on Republican Guard divisions and on a handful of
stalwart regular divisions that formed part of the defensive ring south of
Baghdad.
One prominent air interdiction success story involved the Iraqi Republican
Guard’s redeployment of elements of the Hammurabi, Nebuchadnezzar, and
Al Nida divisions after 25 March 2003 to the south of Baghdad toward
Karbala, Hillah, and Al Cut. Their road movements were steadily bombed by
US Air Force A-10s and B-52s (dropping 500-pound bombs) and British
Tornados. An Iraqi commander concluded that their movement south had
been one of the Iraqi regime’s major errors because it exposed the
Republican Guard to coalition air power and resulted in large casualty
figures.
SOURCE: Project on Defense Alternatives Briefing Memo #30
Carl Conetta, 26 September 2003