JP 3-60, page 109
Joint Targeting
Joint Publication: Joint Targeting
31 January 2013 public edition
Searchable page text (OCR / PDF)
D-1
APPENDIX D
THE TARGETING ASSESSMENT PROCESS
1. The Purpose of Assessment
a. Assessment is used to measure progress of the joint force toward mission
accomplishment. Commanders continuously assess the operational environment and the
progress of operations, and compare them to their initial vision and intent. Commanders
adjust operations based on their assessment to ensure tasks are completed, effects created,
objectives achieved, and the desired end state reached. The assessment process is continuous
and directly tied to the commander’s decisions throughout planning, preparation, and
execution of operations. Staffs monitor key factors that can influence operations and provide
the commander timely information needed for decisions. The assessment process helps the
commander and staff decide what and how to measure to determine progress toward
accomplishing a task, creating an effect, or achieving an objective. Commanders and their
staffs determine relevant assessment actions and measures during planning. They consider
assessment measures as early as mission analysis, and include assessment measures and
related guidance in commander and staff estimates. They use assessment considerations to
help guide operational design because these considerations can affect the sequence and type
of actions along lines of operations. Phase 6 (Targeting Assessment) is a continuous process
that measures the overall effectiveness of employing joint force targeting capabilities during
military operations. It supports the commander’s decisions within the joint targeting cycle
and contributes to the overall operation or campaign assessment process.
b. During execution, commanders continually monitor progress toward accomplishing
tasks, creating effects, and achieving objectives. Assessment actions and measures help
commanders adjust operations and resources as required and make other decisions to ensure
current and future operations remain aligned with the mission and desired end state.
Normally, the joint force J-3, assisted by the J-2, is responsible for coordinating assessment
activities at the JFC’s level. Various elements of the JFC’s staff use assessment results to
adjust both current operations and future planning.
c. During conflict, the US will use all instruments of its national power against the full
spectrum of adversary systems—political, military, economic, social, infrastructure,
information, and others. Organizationally diverse, yet operationally interconnected,
instruments of national power must be synchronized to achieve the desired objectives.
Assessment must parallel this multidimensional approach. Friendly, adversary, and neutral
diplomatic, informational, and economic actions applied in the operational environment can
impact military actions and objectives. Conversely, military actions will influence the
employment and effects of diplomatic, informational, and economic instruments of national
power in the operational environment (see Figure D-1). The commander should plan to
assess the results of these actions. This typically requires collaboration with other agencies
such as elements from DOS or the Department of Homeland Security, national intelligence
agencies, multinational partners, intelligence sources, and other combatant commands to
generate a complete and accurate assessment.