MCRP 12-10B.1, page 349
Military Operations on Urbanized Terrain (MOUT)
Marine Corps Reference Publication: Military Operations on Urbanized Terrain (MOUT)
Public distribution statement A; S2 KOCOA cited as MCRP 12-10 b.1
Searchable page text (OCR / PDF)
Appendix J
Lessons Learned from Russian Military Operations
in Chechnya 1994-1996
1. Introduction. Many historical studies of urban combat have become dated. This is primarily
the result of the impact that technology has had on military capabilities and evolving tactics.
However, certain tenets of urban combat remain constant. The battles for the city of Grozny
during the Russian intervention in the Republic of Chechnya represent a recent and critically
important example of large scale operations in urban combat. Combat in Grozny was
characterized by a large, technologically sophisticated military force (Russian) engaging and
ultimately being defeated by a small, relatively primitive irregular force (Chechen). Grozny
provides a number of fresh insights, and reinforcement of time honored tenets of urban warfare,
across the scope of activities germane to modern urban combat.
2. Operations in Chechnya. Russia's war in Chechnya essentially began with the collapse of
the Soviet Union, immediately after which pro-independence factions in Chechnya began agitating
to free the Republic from Russian domination. This eventually led to civil war with pro-Russian
factions within the Republic. Russia committed troops to Chechnya on 11 December 1994, for
what many in the Russian government and military thought would be a quick campaign to restore
Russian primacy. What followed was a bitter, costly, and protracted struggle that ended with the
complete withdrawal of Russian military forces from Chechnya.
A primary focus of Russian operations in Chechnya was the capture of the capital city, Grozny.
The initial attack on Grozny was conducted by a mechanized force, consisting of 6,000 troops
mounted in tanks, BMP infantry fighting vehicles, and BTR armored personnel carriers. The
Russians anticipated light opposition, but instead met a determined and heavy resistance from
Chechens armed with a large number of antitank weapons. The attack was repulsed with
significant Russian losses, both in personnel and armored vehicles (105 of 120 vehicles were lost).
A second mechanized attack conducted on New Years Eve, 1994, was also repulsed with the loss
of 140 of 200 tanks employed. The Russians captured Grozny some two months later, primarily
through the use of excessive, overwhelming firepower, and at great cost to themselves and the
local Chechen population.
The capture of Grozny marked the end of the first phase of Russian combat operations in
Chechnya. Beginning in March 1995, the Russians became heavily engaged in anti-partisan
operations as they tried to gain control of the country. Though the Russians controlled several
major Chechen cities and a portion of the countryside by May 1995, they were never able to fully
isolate the Republic. Chechen separatist fighters continued to receive a steady flow of arms and
supplies from neighboring countries. Consequently, the Chechen fighters were able to maintain
the initiative throughout this period, engaging Russian forces whenever and wherever they chose.
Even late in the campaign, Russian intelligence failed to detect Chechen fighters infiltrating
Grozny, which enabled the Chechens to launch a major attack against the Russian-controlled city
in early August 1996. The Chechens succeeded in capturing the city less than two weeks later.
J-1