JP 3-0, page 109
Joint Operations
Joint Publication: Joint Operations
11 August 2011 public edition
Searchable page text (OCR / PDF)
Joint Operations Across the Range of Military Operations
V-3
supporting forces through subordinate and supporting JFCs to achieve national,
theater, and/or multinational strategic objectives. Due to the transnational nature of
various enemies or adversaries (e.g., insurgents, terrorists, drug cartels, pirates),
coordination and synchronization requirements may also extend to adjacent GCCs.
Additionally, CCDRs and subordinate JFCs must work with US chiefs of mission,
Department of State (DOS), and other departments and agencies to best integrate
military actions with the diplomatic, economic, and informational instruments of national
power in unified action.
(2) Some military operations may be conducted for one purpose. FHA
operations, for example, are military operations with a humanitarian purpose. A strike
may be conducted for the specific purpose of compelling action or deterrence (such as
Operation EL DORADO CANYON, the 1986 operation to coerce Libya to conform with
international laws against terrorism). Often, however, military operations will have
multiple purposes and be influenced by a fluid and changing situation. Branch and
sequel events may require additional tasks by the joint force, challenging the command
with multiple missions (e.g., Operations PROVIDE COMFORT and RESTORE HOPE
were peace enforcement operations [PEO] that evolved from FHA efforts). Joint forces
must strive to meet such challenges with clearly defined objectives addressing diverse
purposes.
SECTION A. TYPES OF MILITARY OPERATIONS
2. Military Operations and Related Missions, Tasks, and Actions
a. In general, a military operation is a set of actions intended to accomplish a task or
mission. Although the US military is organized, trained, and equipped for sustained,
large-scale combat anywhere in the world, the capabilities to conduct these operations
also enable a wide variety of other operations as well. No two military operations are
exactly alike. Characterizing the employment of military capabilities (people,
organizations, and equipment) as one or another type of military operations has several
benefits. For example, publications can be developed that describe the nature, tasks, and
tactics associated with specific types of diverse operations, such as noncombatant
evacuation and counterinsurgency. These publications provide the bases for related joint
training and joint professional military education that help joint forces conduct military
operations as effectively and efficiently as possible even in difficult and dangerous
circumstances. Characterizations also help military and civilian leaders explain US
military involvement in various situations to the US and international public and news
media in order to minimize misinterpretation of purpose. Likewise, such
characterizations, supplemented by operational experience, can clarify the need for
specific capabilities that enhance certain operations. For example, facial recognition
software associated with biometric capabilities helps military and law enforcement
personnel identify terrorists and piece together their human networks as part of
combating terrorism (see JP 3-07.2, Antiterrorism). The titles of many operations (such
as NEO) listed as “types” in the following paragraph describe the operation’s focused
task or mission. In some cases (such as stability operations), the title covers a variety of
missions, tasks, and activities.