JP 3-0, page 126

Chapter V V-20 JP 3-0 force is able to conduct decisive operations and the national leadership is willing to employ that force and to deploy more forces if necessary. c. Scope. Crisis response and limited contingency operations are typically limited in scope and scale and conducted to achieve a very specific strategic or operational objective in an operational area. They may be conducted as stand-alone operations in response to a crisis (such as a NEO) or executed as an element of a larger, more complex campaign or major operation. Crisis response and limited contingency operations may be conducted to achieve operational and, sometimes, strategic objectives. d. Political Aspects. Two important factors about political primacy in crisis response and foreign limited contingency operations stand out. First, understanding the political objective helps avoid actions that may have adverse effects. It is not uncommon in some operations, such as peacekeeping, for junior leaders to make decisions that have significant political implications. Second, commanders should remain aware of changes not only in the operational situation, but also in political objectives that may warrant a change in military operations. These changes may not always be obvious. Therefore, commanders must strive to detect subtle changes, which may eventually lead to disconnects between political objectives and military operations. Failure to recognize changes in political objectives early may lead to ineffective or counterproductive military operations. e. Economy of Force. The strategic environment requires the United States to maintain and prepare joint forces for crisis response and limited contingency operations simultaneously with other operations, preferably in concert with allies and/or coalition partners when appropriate. This approach recognizes that these operations will vary in duration, frequency, intensity, and the number of personnel required. The burden of many crisis response and limited contingency operations may lend themselves to using small elements like SOF in coordination with allied HNs. Initially, SOF may take the lead of these operations as an economy of force measure to enable major operations and campaigns with conventional focus to progress more effectively. 8. Typical Operations a. NEOs are operations directed by the DOS or other appropriate authority, in conjunction with DOD, whereby noncombatants and civilians are evacuated from locations within foreign countries to safe havens when their lives are endangered by, or in anticipation of, war, civil unrest, or natural disaster. Although principally conducted to evacuate US citizens, NEOs also may include citizens from the HN as well as citizens from other countries. Pursuant to Executive Order 12656, Assignment of Emergency Preparedness Responsibilities, DOS is responsible for the protection and evacuation of American citizens abroad and for safeguarding their property. This order also directs DOD to advise and assist DOS in preparing and implementing plans for the evacuation of US citizens. The US ambassador, or chief of the diplomatic mission, is responsible for preparation of emergency action plans that address the military evacuation of US citizens and designated foreign nationals from a foreign country. The conduct of military