JP 3-60, page 39

The Joint Targeting Cycle II-9 (b) Target system components are a related group of entities within a target system that performs or contributes toward a similar function. The emphasis in component identification shifts from the system to the specific activities, such as industries and basic utilities involved in producing parts of an end product. The same general analytic process applies for nonindustrial target systems. For example, the components of a ballistic missile target system might include missile transporter erector launchers, resupply vehicles, C2 links and nodes, meteorological radars, missile fuel storage sites and/or shelters, deployment areas, and the supporting road transportation network; while an insurgency’s components may include its core leadership, its military and political arms, its international political and financial network, and the active or passive support of the population. The purpose of a TSA is to identify targeting strategies that enable a JFC to use targeting to accomplish objectives and to identify high value and high payoff targets that underpin those strategies. Targeteers should consider a target’s criticality and vulnerability when evaluating its value or payoff, and how much its engagement will contribute to the targeting strategy (see Figure II-6). 1. Criticality. Criticality measures a target’s contribution to a target system’s larger function and its relative importance within the target system. Target development focuses on identifying critical nodes within key target systems to achieve objectives and conform to JFC guidance. There are four factors that measure a targets criticality: a. Value. Value measures the target’s importance to the adversary’s target system and to a friendly force’s ability to accomplish a mission or achieve an objective. Significance is the degree of concern in excess of the value assigned to its normal performance. This value measurement may reflect relative military, economic, political, psychological, informational, environmental, cultural, or geographic importance. Psychological significance assigned to a target reflects the thought processes of the adversary. For example, the birthplace of a political, religious, or cultural leader may hold greater psychological significance than its military value merits. b. Depth is a measure of the time between the disruption of a target’s activity and its measurable impact on system output. Average depth is a time construct designed to measure the average interval between the time the production of an item begins and the time the finished product appears in use by a tactical unit. Understanding the target’s depth provides the targeteer with an important measure of the time available for the Figure II-6. Factors in Target Evaluation Within a Target System Analysis Factors in Target Evaluation Within a Target System Analysis Criticality     Value Depth Recuperation Capacity Vulnerability       Cushion Reserves Dispersion Mobility Countermeasures Physical Characteristics